TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal allows appeals, clarifies factory units for tax exemption eligibility.</h1> <h3>M/s Victora Automotive Inc., Baljeet Singh Rawat, Daleep Suneja, H.S. Banga, Naveen Kumar Maheshwari Versus CCE, Meerut</h3> M/s Victora Automotive Inc., Baljeet Singh Rawat, Daleep Suneja, H.S. Banga, Naveen Kumar Maheshwari Versus CCE, Meerut - TMI Issues:Admissibility of benefit of exemption under Notification No. 50/2003-CE dated 10.06.2003 for Unit-II manufacturing excisable goods in Uttarakhand without duty payment.Analysis:The appeals were against the order-in-original dated 28.02.2014 by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Meerut-I, concerning the period from April 2008 to September 2012. The central issue revolved around the admissibility of exemption under Notification No. 50/2003-CE for Unit-II, where goods were manufactured and cleared without duty payment due to the factory's location in Uttarakhand. The Department had not provided the exemption during the period in question, leading to the filing of the appeals.During the hearing, the appellant's advocate and the respondent's representative presented their arguments. The Tribunal referred to a previous case involving the same appellant, where it was observed that the identity of the factory was not directly relevant to determining the exemption under Notification No. 50/03. The Tribunal noted factual errors in the original authority's decision and emphasized that each section or part of a factory manufacturing different commodities should be treated as a separate manufacturing unit, eligible for exemption independently.The Tribunal cited a clarification by the CBEC regarding the application of the notification, highlighting that even a new assembly line within an existing factory could be eligible for exemption. Referring to previous judgments, including one by the Supreme Court, the Tribunal reiterated that different terms like 'unit' and 'factory' should not be equated for the purpose of the notification, as the exemption was unit-wise, not factory-wise.Ultimately, after careful consideration of the impugned order and the appellant's submissions, the Tribunal found the order unsustainable and allowed the appeals, setting aside the original decision. The Tribunal's decision was based on the interpretation that different identifiable units within a factory should be considered separately for exemption eligibility under Notification No. 50/2003-CE, emphasizing the distinction between 'unit' and 'factory' in the context of the exemption provision.
TaxTMI 