TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal overturns customs valuation decision on 'VANNI' optical frames, emphasizing due process.</h1> <h3>M/s I Décor India Pvt. Ltd. Versus CC, New Delhi</h3> M/s I Décor India Pvt. Ltd. Versus CC, New Delhi - TMI Issues:1. Correctness of the declared value of imported optical frames.2. Re-determination of assessable value and confiscation of goods.3. Imposition of penalties under Customs Act, 1962.4. Acceptability of market enquiry and contemporaneous import value.Analysis:1. The case involved a dispute over the correctness of the declared value of imported optical frames bearing the brand name 'VANNI.' The officers doubted the declared value and initiated proceedings to enhance it, leading to confiscation of goods and imposition of penalties under the Customs Act, 1962.2. The Original Authority initially rejected the declared value and re-determined it at a higher amount, ordering confiscation of goods with fines imposed. Despite appeals and remands, the assessable value was re-determined multiple times, with the final assessment being significantly lower than the initial determination.3. The penalties imposed under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962, were also a subject of contention, with the Commissioner (Appeals) and the Tribunal scrutinizing the process of re-determination and the basis for imposing penalties in each instance.4. The acceptability of market enquiry and contemporaneous import value comparison was a crucial aspect of the case. The Tribunal found fault with the process followed by the Revenue in re-determining the assessable value, highlighting discrepancies in the basis for assessment and the lack of opportunity provided to the appellant to defend their case adequately.In conclusion, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order, ruling that the re-determination of assessable value lacked proper procedural adherence and substantive basis. The appeal was allowed, emphasizing the importance of following due process and providing fair opportunities for defense in customs valuation disputes.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
