Tribunal directs AO to delete partial disallowance of interest & loan charges, recalculate Section 14A.

The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the AO to delete the partial disallowance of interest expenditure and loan processing charges. Additionally, the disallowance under Section 14A was to be recomputed by excluding investments not yielding exempt income.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Disallowance of interest expenditure of Rs. 6,58,14,482.
2. Disallowance of loan processing charges of Rs. 1,01,25,000.
3. Disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Disallowance of Interest Expenditure of Rs. 6,58,14,482:

The assessee borrowed Rs. 200 crores from Central Bank of India and utilized these funds to make interest-bearing advances to Shri Bhakti Realtors Pvt. Ltd. and Mahakaleshwar Knowledge Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. The Assessing Officer (AO) disallowed a portion of the interest expenditure, allowing only the amount recovered from these entities, resulting in an addition of Rs. 6,58,14,482 to the returned income. The AO's disallowance was based on two components: the difference in interest rates (Rs. 1,18,83,557) and penal interest (Rs. 5,40,00,000).

The Tribunal found that the assessee had deployed the funds for commercial expediency, as the advances were made for infrastructure development projects. The Tribunal emphasized that the difference in interest rates does not negate commercial expediency. The Tribunal also noted that Mahakaleshwar provided collateral security and became a subsidiary of the assessee, further supporting the business purpose. The Tribunal directed the AO to verify the payment of penal interest and, if not paid, to allow the entire interest expenditure.

2. Disallowance of Loan Processing Charges of Rs. 1,01,25,000:

The loan processing charges were disallowed by the lower authorities as a consequence of the disallowance of a portion of the interest expenditure. Since the Tribunal held that the interest expenditure is allowable, it consequently allowed the loan processing charges as well.

3. Disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act:

The AO disallowed Rs. 1,98,62,048 under Section 14A, applying Rule 8D, which included disallowance out of interest expenditure (Rs. 1,87,36,126) and overheads/administrative expenses (Rs. 11,25,992). The CIT(A) reduced the disallowance to Rs. 89,57,903, excluding interest disallowed under Section 36(1)(iii) and interest on car loan and delayed TDS payment.

The Tribunal found that no fresh investments were made during the year, and the investments yielding exempt income were made in earlier years from own funds. It noted that in the previous year, no interest expenditure was disallowed under Section 14A. The Tribunal held that no disallowance out of interest expenditure is warranted. For overheads/administrative expenses, the Tribunal directed the AO to exclude investments not yielding exempt income while computing disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(iii).

Conclusion:

The Tribunal allowed the appeal partly, directing the AO to delete the partial disallowance of interest expenditure and loan processing charges, and to recompute the disallowance under Section 14A by excluding investments not yielding exempt income. The order was pronounced on 15th November 2017.

---