Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether tax deducted at source from compensation paid for acquired land was refundable where the land was claimed to be agricultural land, and whether limitation would prevent the Income Tax Department from taking consequential action in pending or delayed matters.
Analysis: The appeal was disposed of in the same terms as the earlier batch decision, which directed the affected persons to file returns before the Assessing Officer and required the Department to examine whether the compensation related to agricultural land. It was also directed that the question whether interest paid under Section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 formed part of compensation should be determined in the light of the applicable legal position, and that where notices or assessments had not already been made, limitation would not stand in the way if action was taken within the stipulated period. The earlier direction requiring refund of TDS to the Land Acquisition Collector was set aside, while completed refunds were left undisturbed.
Conclusion: The matter was disposed of by applying the earlier directions, with the principal relief operating in favour of the persons entitled to refund of TDS on compensation relating to agricultural land, and with consequential action by the Department permitted in accordance with law.
Ratio Decidendi: Where compensation is claimed to relate to agricultural land, the Assessing Officer must determine the true character of the land and refund TDS if the statutory conditions are satisfied, and procedural limitation will not defeat timely consequential action taken pursuant to the Court's directions.