1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>High Court overturns disallowance based on commission payment, rules in favor of assessee.</h1> The High Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the disallowance of payment to M/s. Laxmi Stones Pvt. Ltd. The disallowance was based on commission ... Payment of commission – Disallowed as bogus in some assessment year – Allowed in different assessment years as paid to same parties – held that - Since, it has been found by the learned Tribunal, that the only basis for making other addition, by the Assessing Officer, is the disallowance of the commission, to the same party, which has been upheld up to the Tribunal, in our view, when the disallowance has been set aside by this court, by the aforesaid judgment dated December 13, 2007, for the same reasons, rather of necessity, disallowance in this case, has also to be set aside. – commission paid for erection and installation charges allowed. Issues:Disallowance of payment to M/s. Laxmi Stones Pvt. Ltd.Analysis:The appeal in question was admitted by the High Court based on the substantial question of law regarding the disallowance of Rs. 2,44,000 claimed to have been paid as erection and installation charges to M/s. Laxmi Stones Pvt. Ltd. The Tribunal had allowed the appeal of the Revenue solely on the basis of the commission payment to M/s. Laxmi Stone Pvt. Ltd., which was deemed bogus by the Assessing Officer and subsequently disallowed. However, it was noted that a previous judgment by the High Court in a related matter had set aside the disallowance of commission payments to the same party in other appeals by the same assessee. Therefore, since the disallowance had been overturned by the High Court in a previous judgment, the disallowance in the current case was also set aside.The High Court found that the only basis for making additional additions by the Assessing Officer was the disallowance of commission to the same party, which had been upheld up to the Tribunal level. However, given that the previous judgment had set aside the disallowance of commission payments for the same reasons, the High Court concluded that the disallowance in the current case should also be set aside. Consequently, the High Court answered the framed question in favor of the assessee and against the Revenue. The impugned order of the Tribunal was set aside, and the disallowance of the erection charges amounting to Rs. 2,44,000 was also set aside.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
