Tariff classification of lead grey oxide under Chapter 38 defeats excise demand, exemption denial and penalty.

Lead grey oxide or lead sub-oxide emerging in the manufacture of lead acid batteries was examined for tariff classification under Chapter 28 or Chapter 38 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The product was treated as a distinct intermediate material and not the chemically defined inorganic lead oxide assumed in the impugned orders; no chemical test supported the original classification. Relying on earlier decisions on identical facts, it was held to fall under Chapter 38. As Chapter 38 goods were not covered by the negative list in Notification No. 50/2003-CE, the exemption denial and related duty demand failed, and the penalty under Rule 25 read with Section 11AC was also unsustainable.

---

---

Issues: Whether lead grey oxide or lead sub-oxide emerging during manufacture of lead acid batteries is classifiable under Chapter 28 or Chapter 38 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, and whether the consequent duty demand and penalty could be sustained.

Analysis: The intermediate product was found to be lead grey oxide or lead sub-oxide, and not the chemically defined inorganic lead oxide assumed in the impugned orders. No chemical test had established the classification adopted by the original authority. Following earlier decisions on identical facts, the product was held to fall under Chapter 38. Since Chapter 38 goods were not included in the negative list under Notification No. 50/2003-CE, the basis for denying exemption and confirming duty did not survive. The penalty imposed under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 read with Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944 also could not stand.

Conclusion: The classification under Chapter 38 was accepted, and the demand, interest and penalty were unsustainable.

---