Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Appeals partly allowed for Assessment Year 2009-10, assessee wins transfer pricing dispute. Remand for fresh determination.

        AVL India Private Limited Versus DCIT, Circle-2 (1), New Delhi

        AVL India Private Limited Versus DCIT, Circle-2 (1), New Delhi - Tmi Issues Involved:
        1. Transfer Pricing Adjustment towards Interest on Receivables
        2. Disallowance under Section 14A of the Income-tax Act, 1961

        Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

        1. Transfer Pricing Adjustment towards Interest on Receivables:

        Assessment Year 2009-10:
        - The first issue pertains to the confirmation of addition on account of transfer pricing adjustment towards interest on receivables.
        - The assessee, engaged in manufacturing and trading of pollution monitoring equipment, reported ten international transactions. The Assessing Officer (AO) referred the determination of the arm’s length price (ALP) of these transactions to the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO).
        - The TPO identified certain receivables from Associated Enterprises (AEs) not received within a reasonable period, considering them as international transactions under Explanation 1(c) to section 92B inserted by the Finance Act, 2002.
        - The TPO applied the Comparable Uncontrolled Price (CUP) method, using the Prime lending rate of RBI plus 500 basis points (17.22%) as a benchmark, resulting in a transfer pricing adjustment of Rs. 56,53,235/-.
        - The CIT(A) allowed a credit period of 180 days and the benefit of netting interest on receivables and payables with the same party, reducing the addition to Rs. 5,08,487/-.
        - The Tribunal held that interest on receivables is an international transaction and should be benchmarked accordingly. It was decided that the international transactions of trade receivables and payables with all AEs should be aggregated and processed as a single transaction. Consequently, no interest receivable from the AE was liable to be added as a transfer pricing adjustment.

        Assessment Year 2010-11:
        - The assessee continued similar operations and reported eight international transactions.
        - The AO allowed a credit period of 180 days and netting of interest receivable with interest payable, applying a benchmark interest rate of 14.88%, resulting in a transfer pricing adjustment of Rs. 6,96,516/-.
        - The Tribunal reiterated that interest on receivables is an international transaction and netting of interest should be allowed on an aggregate basis.
        - The Tribunal disapproved the application of the interest rate on bonds (14.88%) as a benchmark for trade receivables, emphasizing the need for a comparable uncontrolled transaction.
        - The Tribunal directed the AO/TPO to benchmark the international transaction of ‘Interest on receivables’ based on internal CUP (Comparable Uncontrolled Price) and determine the transfer pricing adjustment, if any.

        2. Disallowance under Section 14A of the Income-tax Act, 1961:

        Assessment Year 2009-10:
        - The assessee did not offer any disallowance under Section 14A. The AO computed disallowance under Rule 8D to the tune of Rs. 52,449/-, being half percent of the average value of investments.
        - The CIT(A) upheld the addition.
        - The Tribunal observed that the assessee did not earn any exempt income during the year. Following the Delhi High Court rulings in Cheminvest Ltd. vs. CIT and CIT vs. Holcim India P. Ltd., the Tribunal held that no disallowance under Section 14A can be made in the absence of exempt income and ordered the deletion of the disallowance.

        Assessment Year 2010-11:
        - This issue was not pressed in the appeal for this year.

        Conclusion:
        - The appeals for the Assessment Year 2009-10 were partly allowed, with the Tribunal ruling in favor of the assessee on both the issues of transfer pricing adjustment and disallowance under Section 14A.
        - For the Assessment Year 2010-11, the appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, with the matter of transfer pricing adjustment being remanded back to the AO/TPO for fresh determination based on internal CUP.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found