Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2017 (11) TMI 515 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Transfer Pricing Adjustment Decisions: Exclusions, Adjustments, and Rejections The Tribunal directed the Transfer Pricing Officer to exclude Hindustan Syringes & Medical Devices Pvt. Ltd. and Pregna International Ltd. from the ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Transfer Pricing Adjustment Decisions: Exclusions, Adjustments, and Rejections

                          The Tribunal directed the Transfer Pricing Officer to exclude Hindustan Syringes & Medical Devices Pvt. Ltd. and Pregna International Ltd. from the comparability analysis, grant working capital adjustment, include duty drawback and DEPB as operational income, consider foreign exchange fluctuations related to revenue transactions as operational items, and reject the risk adjustment due to insufficient quantifiable data. As a result, the appeal of the assessee was partly allowed.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Inclusion of Hindustan Syringes & Medical Devices Pvt. Ltd. as a comparable.
                          2. Inclusion of Pregna International Ltd. as a comparable.
                          3. Computation of margins of the comparable companies.
                          4. Risk adjustment.
                          5. Working capital adjustment.

                          Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Inclusion of Hindustan Syringes & Medical Devices Pvt. Ltd. as a Comparable:
                          The assessee contended that Hindustan Syringes & Medical Devices Pvt. Ltd. is not a suitable comparable due to significant differences in turnover, product range, and use of raw materials. The Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) included it as a comparable, stating that it is a medical disposable manufacturer with available financial data. The Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) upheld this inclusion, noting that TNMM allows some flexibility in comparability. However, the Tribunal found that Hindustan Syringes is a full-fledged manufacturer with significant R&D activities, use of intangibles, and trading activities, which are not comparable to the assessee, who is merely an assembler. The Tribunal directed the TPO to exclude Hindustan Syringes from the comparability analysis.

                          2. Inclusion of Pregna International Ltd. as a Comparable:
                          The assessee argued that Pregna International Ltd. is not a suitable comparable as it manufactures medical implants and electronic components, which are different from the assessee's medical disposables. The TPO included Pregna, stating it is a manufacturer of medical disposables. The DRP upheld this inclusion, applying the same reasoning as for Hindustan Syringes. The Tribunal noted that Pregna's product range includes electronic items and implants, making it functionally different from the assessee. The Tribunal directed the TPO to exclude Pregna from the comparability analysis.

                          3. Computation of Margins of the Comparable Companies:
                          The assessee disputed the inclusion of duty drawback and DEPB as operational income and the exclusion of foreign exchange fluctuations as non-operational items. The Tribunal held that duty drawback and DEPB are part of operational income as they reduce the cost of raw materials. Foreign exchange fluctuations related to revenue transactions and hedging were considered operational. The Tribunal directed the TPO to include these items in the computation of margins.

                          4. Risk Adjustment:
                          The assessee sought risk adjustment, arguing that it bears fewer business risks compared to the comparables. However, the Tribunal noted that no quantifiable risk adjustment data was provided by the assessee. Therefore, the Tribunal did not entertain the ground for risk adjustment.

                          5. Working Capital Adjustment:
                          The assessee argued for working capital adjustment, stating that it has negative working capital due to advance payments from its associated enterprise, while the comparables have positive working capital. The Tribunal directed the TPO to grant working capital adjustment based on the opening and closing balances of working capital, provided the assessee submits the relevant details.

                          Conclusion:
                          The Tribunal directed the TPO to:
                          1. Exclude Hindustan Syringes & Medical Devices Pvt. Ltd. and Pregna International Ltd. from the comparability analysis.
                          2. Grant working capital adjustment based on the provided details.
                          3. Include duty drawback and DEPB as operational income.
                          4. Include foreign exchange fluctuations related to revenue transactions as operational items.
                          5. Not allow risk adjustment due to lack of quantifiable data.

                          Result:
                          The appeal of the assessee was partly allowed.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found