Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether duty paid goods received back under Rule 16(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 had to be treated as inputs for all purposes so as to require reversal of the entire CENVAT credit when the final products later became exempt from duty.
Analysis: Rule 16(1) entitles an assessee to take CENVAT credit on duty paid goods brought back to the factory as if such goods were received as inputs, and to utilize that credit under the CENVAT Credit Rules. The provision does not require the returned goods to continue to be treated as inputs for every subsequent purpose after credit is taken. The assessee had already reversed credit relatable to inputs in stock, work-in-progress, and finished goods on the date the final products became exempt. The demand was founded only on the view that the credit taken on the returned yarn itself had to be reversed merely because the final products later became exempt.
Conclusion: The demand for reversal of the credit taken on the returned goods was not sustainable, and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.