Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2017 (11) TMI 122 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal quashes proceedings, allows carry forward of losses, favors assessee-company The Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing proceedings under section 153C and deleting additions for unexplained cash credit. It permitted set-off and ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tribunal quashes proceedings, allows carry forward of losses, favors assessee-company

                          The Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing proceedings under section 153C and deleting additions for unexplained cash credit. It permitted set-off and carry forward of current year and brought forward losses. The decision favored the assessee-company due to insufficient evidence linking seized material to the company and the company proving the genuineness of the cash credit. The Tribunal's ruling impacted the charging of interest under sections 234A/234B, which was not specifically addressed.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Validity of proceedings under section 153C of the I.T. Act.
                          2. Addition of Rs. 3.18 crores as unexplained cash credit under section 68 of the I.T. Act.
                          3. Disallowance of current year loss and brought forward losses.
                          4. Charging of interest under section 234A/234B of the I.T. Act.

                          Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Validity of proceedings under section 153C of the I.T. Act:
                          The primary condition for initiating proceedings under section 153C is that the seized material should belong to a person other than the one searched. The Tribunal noted that no incriminating material was found during the search that belonged to the assessee-company. The documents seized were from third parties (Today Group of cases) and not from the assessee-company. The Tribunal emphasized that the A.O. did not provide sufficient evidence to prove that the seized material belonged to the assessee-company. Citing various judicial precedents, including the Hon’ble Supreme Court and High Courts, the Tribunal concluded that the conditions precedent for initiating proceedings under section 153C were not satisfied, thereby rendering the proceedings invalid.

                          2. Addition of Rs. 3.18 crores as unexplained cash credit under section 68 of the I.T. Act:
                          The A.O. added Rs. 3.18 crores to the assessee-company's income, alleging it was unexplained cash credit. The assessee-company provided evidence such as PAN, confirmation, bank statements, and income tax returns of the creditor, M/s. Double Star Builders Pvt. Ltd. The A.O. dismissed these documents, arguing that the transactions did not pass the test of genuineness and were accommodation entries. However, the Tribunal found that the assessee-company had discharged its onus by proving the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the transaction. The Tribunal referred to judicial precedents, including the Hon’ble Delhi High Court, which held that the assessee need not prove the source of the source. Consequently, the Tribunal deleted the addition made by the A.O.

                          3. Disallowance of current year loss and brought forward losses:
                          The A.O. disallowed the loss of Rs. 24,16,422 for the current year and the brought forward losses, citing that the return was not filed within the stipulated time under section 153C. The Tribunal noted that the assessee-company had filed the original return on 30th October 2007, and the return under section 153C on 11th July 2011. The Tribunal held that the A.O. should not have denied the brought forward losses as the returns were part of the record and mentioned in the books of account. The Tribunal found the A.O.'s disallowance incorrect and allowed the set-off and carry forward of the losses.

                          4. Charging of interest under section 234A/234B of the I.T. Act:
                          The Tribunal did not specifically address the issue of charging interest under sections 234A/234B, as the primary issues regarding the validity of proceedings under section 153C and the addition of unexplained cash credit were decided in favor of the assessee-company. The quashing of the proceedings under section 153C inherently affected the imposition of interest under these sections.

                          Conclusion:
                          The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee-company, quashing the proceedings under section 153C and deleting the additions made by the A.O. on account of unexplained cash credit. The Tribunal also allowed the set-off and carry forward of the current year and brought forward losses. The decision was pronounced in the open court.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found