Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether supplies made to a project financed by the Asian Development Bank and cleared under Notification No. 108/95-CE could be treated as export or deemed export so as to qualify for refund of unutilised Cenvat credit under Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.
Analysis: Rule 5 permits refund of Cenvat credit only where the input or input service is used in the manufacture of final products cleared for export under bond or letter of undertaking, or in other categories specifically covered by the rule. The supplies in question were made to an ADB-financed project in India and were not treated as export. The claimed basis of deemed export under para 8.3 of the EXIM Policy 2012-2013 was examined, but goods cleared to such projects were not shown to be specified as deemed exports. The factual features noted below also supported the conclusion that the transaction was not an export transaction: no foreign currency realization and no bill of export.
Conclusion: The supplies did not amount to export or deemed export, and the appellant was not eligible for refund of Cenvat credit under Rule 5.
Final Conclusion: The rejection of the refund claim was sustained and the appeal failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Refund of Cenvat credit under Rule 5 is available only where the relevant clearance falls within the categories of export or other legally recognised deemed export situations, and a supply to an ADB-financed domestic project not so recognised does not qualify.