Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether exemption under Notification No. 50/2003-CE was to be applied unit-wise or factory-wise, and whether the assessee's separate manufacturing units were independently entitled to the benefit.
Analysis: The exemption notification was framed for new industrial units or existing industrial units undertaking substantial expansion, and not for a factory as a single composite entity. The expressions "factory" and "industrial unit" were treated as carrying different meanings, and each identifiable section or part of a factory engaged in distinct manufacture could be regarded as a separate unit for the purpose of the notification. The wider definition of "factory" under Section 2(e) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 could not override the unit-based scheme of the exemption. Applying the earlier decision in the assessee's own case, the denial of benefit on a factory-wide basis was unsustainable.
Conclusion: The exemption was held to be unit-wise, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeals were allowed in favour of the assessee.