Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Cenvat credit on inputs and capital goods used in captive mines was admissible when the denial was based on a precedent subsequently overruled by the Supreme Court.
Analysis: The Tribunal noted that the Commissioner (Appeals) had relied on J.K. Udaipur Udyog Ltd. to deny credit, but that ruling stood overruled by the Supreme Court in Vikram Cement. Once the controlling precedent was displaced, the basis for sustaining the denial of Cenvat credit disappeared. The Tribunal therefore found the impugned appellate order to be unsustainable in law.
Conclusion: The denial of Cenvat credit could not be sustained and the appeal was allowed in favour of the assessee.