Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Cenvat credit was admissible on structural steel items used for fabrication of support structures for capital goods installed in the factory.
Analysis: The Tribunal applied the user test to determine whether the goods in question, though not independently capital goods, were used in the fabrication of support structures essential for the functioning of capital goods. It relied on the view that structural items such as MS angles, channels and TMT bars, when used for making support structures on which capital goods are placed, can fall within the ambit of capital goods. The Tribunal also noted that the amendment to the relevant definition with effect from 7 July 2009 was held by the Gujarat High Court to operate prospectively and not as a clarificatory amendment. At the same time, the claim had to be supported by evidence of actual use.
Conclusion: Such structural items would be eligible for Cenvat credit if used for fabrication of support structures for capital goods, but the factual claim required verification on evidence, including a Chartered Engineer's certificate.
Final Conclusion: The matter was remanded for fresh examination of eligibility in the light of the settled legal principle, with the factual issue left open.
Ratio Decidendi: Structural steel items used in the fabrication of support structures for capital goods may qualify for Cenvat credit when their functional use satisfies the user test, and an amendment expanding the exclusion operates prospectively unless expressly made retrospective.