Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Revenue's appeal was not maintainable for want of tax effect, and whether the later CBDT instruction applying notional tax effect in loss cases governed an appeal filed before its issuance.
Analysis: The dispute arose from a loss assessment where the net tax effect was nil. The Tribunal had dismissed the Department's appeal as non-maintainable in view of the earlier CBDT instructions limiting departmental appeals where the tax effect was below the prescribed monetary threshold. The later instruction issued in 2008 regarding notional tax effect in loss cases was held to apply only to appeals filed on or after 15 May 2008. Since the Revenue's appeal had been filed in 2005 and decided in 2007, the later instruction had no application. The earlier instructions governed the matter, and on that basis the Department's appeal before the Tribunal was not maintainable.
Conclusion: The Revenue's appeal was correctly dismissed as non-maintainable, and the later instruction on notional tax effect did not apply to the pending appeal.