TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether receipts from operations carried outside India under a composite turnkey project were taxable in India as attributable to a permanent establishment; (ii) whether interest under section 234B was chargeable; (iii) whether rejection of books of account and estimation of income under section 44BB(1) should be sustained or restored for fresh consideration.
Issue (i): Whether receipts from operations carried outside India under a composite turnkey project were taxable in India as attributable to a permanent establishment.
Analysis: The contract was a composite turnkey arrangement and the assessee ultimately ed that the receipts connected with the project, including those linked to activities performed outside India, had to be taken into account for Indian tax purposes. In view of that concession and the nature of the project, the receipts were held to be attributable to the Indian business operations for tax computation.
Conclusion: The receipts relating to operations carried outside India were held taxable in India and the view of the Assessing Officer was confirmed.
Issue (ii): Whether interest under section 234B was chargeable.
Analysis: The issue was decided by following the jurisdictional High Court view that where the payments were subject to tax deduction at source, levy of advance tax interest was not warranted on the assessee.
Conclusion: Interest under section 234B was held not chargeable.
Issue (iii): Whether rejection of books of account and estimation of income under section 44BB(1) should be sustained or restored for fresh consideration.
Analysis: Since the basis of income computation changed after inclusion of the receipts from outside-India operations, the earlier computation required reconsideration. The matter was therefore sent back to the Assessing Officer to examine the books and recompute income afresh after giving the assessee an opportunity to furnish the necessary accounts and documents.
Conclusion: The rejection of books and the income estimation were set aside and restored to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication.
Final Conclusion: The taxability of the offshore-linked receipts was upheld, interest under section 234B was not levied, and the computation issues were remitted for reconsideration.
Ratio Decidendi: In a composite turnkey project, receipts attributable to the project may be brought to tax in India when the assessee accepts their inclusion for computation, while computational defects affecting the reassessment of income can justify remand; interest under section 234B is not chargeable where tax is deductible at source.
TaxTMI 
