Court rules advance tax payment by Assessee negates employer's liability for grossing up tax on salary. Appeal dismissed. The court upheld the decision of the CIT (Appeal) and ITAT, ruling that the amount paid by the employer was not a monetary perk but rather a non-monetary ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Court rules advance tax payment by Assessee negates employer's liability for grossing up tax on salary. Appeal dismissed.
The court upheld the decision of the CIT (Appeal) and ITAT, ruling that the amount paid by the employer was not a monetary perk but rather a non-monetary perk as the Assessee had paid advance tax. The court found the grossing up of tax liability unjustified since the tax on salary was not borne by the employer. As the advance tax was paid by the Assessee, the grossing up was unsustainable. The court dismissed the appeal due to the low tax effect on the additional amount, concluding that no legal question arose regarding the grossing up of tax liability.
Issues: 1. Whether the amount paid by the employer should be considered a monetary perk. 2. Whether the grossing up of tax liability was justified. 3. Whether the addition of Rs.1,68,104/- should be sustained.
Analysis: 1. The Assessee, an employee of a company, received salary in both Indian and foreign currency, with tax paid by the employer. The Assessing Officer (AO) treated a specific amount as a monetary perk, increasing the gross total income. The CIT (Appeal) later deleted this addition, stating it was a non-monetary perk, as the Assessee had paid advance tax himself. The ITAT upheld this decision based on a previous judgment.
2. The AO grossed up the tax liability without providing a clear basis for doing so. The ITAT found this action unjustified, as there was no evidence that the tax on salary was paid by the employer. The Revenue challenged this decision, arguing that the case should have been remitted back to the AO for clarification. However, the court disagreed, noting that under Section 195A of the Income Tax Act, grossing up could only be done if the tax was borne by the employer. As the advance tax was paid by the Assessee and not the employer, the grossing up was deemed unsustainable.
3. Regarding the addition of Rs.1,68,104/-, the court refused to entertain the appeal due to the low tax effect on that amount, being less than Rs.4 lac. The court ultimately dismissed the appeal, concluding that no question of law arose concerning the grossing up of tax liability, as the advance tax was proven to be paid by the Assessee himself.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
