Appellant's Image Licensing Online Subject to Service Tax.

The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision that the appellant's licensing of images through its website is subject to service tax under "Online Information and Database Access or Retrieval." The Court dismissed the appeal, finding no substantial question of law involved, and confirmed that the consideration received for providing a license to use an image in electronic form constitutes payment for taxable services, with copyright being incidental to the main service of providing access and retrieval of data.

---

---

Issues:
1. Whether the appellant's licensing of images through its website is subject to service tax under the category of "Online Information and Database Access or Retrieval"Rs.
2. Whether the consideration received by the appellant for providing a license to use an image in electronic form constitutes payment for copyright in the imageRs.
3. Whether the licensing of copyright in a particular image amounts to access or retrieval of an online database of imagesRs.

Analysis:
1. The appellant contended that no service tax was payable as they dealt with copyrights, not covered by service tax. The Commissioner and Appellate Tribunal held the service taxable under "Online Information and Database Access or Retrieval." The appellant argued that accessing the website was free, and charges were only for downloading images. However, the Tribunal found that downloading images for commercial use required payment, falling under taxable services.

2. The appellant argued that the consideration received was for copyright, not falling under taxable services. The Tribunal found that while viewing images on the website was free, customers had to pay for downloading images for commercial use, making copyright incidental to the main service of providing access and retrieval of data.

3. The Tribunal referenced a previous case involving online teaching services, distinguishing it from the current case. It confirmed the first appellate authority's findings on the nature of activities carried out by the appellant. The Tribunal concluded that the appellant's services fell under "Online Information and Database Access or Retrieval," different from information technology software services.

In conclusion, the High Court found no merit in the appeal, dismissing it as no substantial question of law was involved. The judgment upheld the Tribunal's decision that the appellant's services were taxable under the category of "Online Information and Database Access or Retrieval," based on the nature of activities and services provided.

---