Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled, pending the writ petition, to protection against further levy and coercive recovery of compensation cess on coal stock on which Clean Energy Cess had already been paid, and to be allowed to continue payments by availing credit for cess already paid.
Analysis: The petition challenged the validity of the Goods and Services Tax (Compensation to States) Act, 2017. For interim purposes, the Court accepted the petitioner's position that a substantial quantity of coal in stock had already suffered Clean Energy Cess under Chapter VII of the Finance Act, 2010. In respect of such stock, the Court directed that no further payment under the impugned levy should be insisted upon during the pendency of the petition, subject to verification of proof of prior payment. The Court further protected the petitioner from coercive recovery action while the departmental verification exercise was carried out, and allowed the petitioner to continue paying taxes by utilising available credit, pending evolution of an appropriate system for electronic returns.
Conclusion: The petitioner was granted interim protection against double levy and coercive recovery in respect of coal stock on which Clean Energy Cess had already been paid, and was permitted to avail credit and continue compliance pending final disposal.