Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Special Committee had acted within the scope of its power under Section 16-D of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959, and whether the assessment orders for the relevant assessment years were liable to be set aside and remanded for fresh consideration.
Analysis: Section 16-D enables the Special Committee to scrutinise proceedings or orders where there is a violation of the Act or the rules or a breach of natural justice, and to pass appropriate orders including directing a fresh assessment. The impugned rejection order failed to address the earlier directions of the High Court and did not reflect any real consideration of the merits. The Court held that the committee's approach was arbitrary and that the assessment orders had merged with the committee's order. In the circumstances, the Court exercised jurisdiction to set aside the assessment proceedings as well and directed a fresh assessment by the assessing officer with an open and independent mind, uninfluenced by the Enforcement Wing report or the Joint Commissioner's directions.
Conclusion: The challenge succeeded to the extent that the impugned order and the assessment orders were set aside, and the matters were remanded for fresh assessment.