Glazed newsprint exemption upheld where chapter notes were read with legislative intent, not a narrow surface roughness test.

Glazed newsprint imported under Chapter 48 was treated as eligible for exemption under Sl. No. 154 of Notification No. 21/2002-Cus., because the surface roughness condition in Chapter Note 4 was not applied rigidly to glazed newsprint. The goods had been glazed, reducing roughness, and the broader scheme of Chapter Note 3, the HSN explanatory notes, and the stated budgetary intent supported inclusion within the exemption entry. Legislative intent was given primacy over a narrow reading of the chapter notes, and the denial of exemption was held unsustainable.

---

---

Issues: Whether glazed newsprint imported by the appellant was eligible for exemption under Sl. No. 154 of Notification No. 21/2002-Cus., despite the surface roughness condition in Chapter Note 4 to Chapter 48.

Analysis: The goods were accepted as falling under Chapter 48 and were only disputed on the surface roughness criterion. The imported goods had undergone glazing, which reduced surface roughness, and the specification meant for ordinary newsprint could not be rigidly applied to glazed newsprint. The broader scheme of Chapter Note 3, the HSN explanatory notes, and the budgetary intention to rationalise duty on glazed newsprint supported the view that glazed newsprint continued to remain within the relevant heading for exemption purposes. In construing the exemption entry, the legislative intent was given primacy over a narrow reading of the chapter notes.

Conclusion: The appellant was held entitled to the exemption benefit under Sl. No. 154 of Notification No. 21/2002-Cus., and the denial of exemption was unsustainable.

---