Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Cenvat credit on dumpers and tyres used in mining operations was admissible as capital goods, and whether the availability of credit depended on whether the mines formed a captive and integrated unit with the manufacturing factory.
Analysis: The dispute turned on the scope of capital goods credit under the Cenvat Credit Rules in relation to goods used in mines. The controlling principle applied was that credit is available where captive mines constitute one integrated unit with the manufacturing factory, but credit is not available where the mines are not captive and supply to different buyers or assessees. The matter therefore required factual verification of the nature of the mines and their linkage with the manufacturing unit before the credit claim could be finally determined.
Conclusion: The issue was not finally decided on merits and was remanded to the Adjudicating Authority for fresh decision in the light of the governing Supreme Court principle.