Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the know-how, technical information and royalty payments under the foreign collaboration agreement were taxable as an intellectual property service under the Finance Act, 1994.
Analysis: The dispute turned on the scope of intellectual property right service under the Finance Act, 1994. The relevant statutory definition required the right to be one recognised under a law for the time being in force. The agreement involved transfer of technical know-how and related information from a foreign collaborator, but the record did not show a right registered or otherwise recognised as an intellectual property right under Indian law. The Tribunal followed its earlier decisions holding that mere technical know-how or a foreign patent position, without recognition under Indian law, does not fall within the taxable category of intellectual property service.
Conclusion: The amounts paid under the agreement were not taxable as intellectual property service, and the demand could not be sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: For levy of service tax under intellectual property service, the underlying right must be an intellectual property right recognised under Indian law for the time being in force.