Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the value of clearances made as a job worker under parallel invoices was includible in the aggregate value for determining eligibility for the SSI exemption under Notification No. 9/2002-C.E., and whether the resulting demand and penalty were sustainable.
Analysis: The clearances covered by the 36 parallel invoices had already been held eligible for exemption under Notification No. 214/86-C.E. Since those clearances were not liable to be included in the aggregate value for determining the first clearances eligible for concessional treatment under Notification No. 9/2002-C.E., the basis for demanding duty at the full rate from invoice Sl. No. 206 onward disappeared. Once the aggregate value was recomputed without those clearances, the demand and consequential penalty could not stand.
Conclusion: The value of the job-work clearances was not includible in the aggregate turnover for SSI exemption, and the duty demand and penalty were unsustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: Clearances already exempted as job-work clearances under the applicable notification cannot be added to the aggregate value for determining the threshold for SSI exemption under another notification.