Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Tribunal could restore the assessment and thereby enhance the assessee's liability in appeals filed only by the assessee, and whether the matter required fresh consideration.
Analysis: The assessment orders and the first appellate orders created a substantial difference in tax liability. The Tribunal, in the assessee's appeals, restored the assessing officer's orders and thus fastened a higher liability on the assessee. The challenge was that no appeal or cross objection had been filed by the Revenue. The Court found that the issues arising from this position were not properly framed or considered, especially in a matter of such magnitude, and that the controversy had to be examined afresh in the light of the cited precedent.
Conclusion: The Tribunal's common order in the appeals and rectification applications was set aside and the matter was left to be decided afresh by the Tribunal in accordance with law.