Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2017 (9) TMI 1190 - AT - Service Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Appeal partially allowed, Cenvat Credit disallowance set aside, Service Tax demand overturned, penalties adjusted. The appeal was partly allowed and partly remanded by the Tribunal. Disallowance of Cenvat Credit on various grounds was set aside, including improper ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Appeal partially allowed, Cenvat Credit disallowance set aside, Service Tax demand overturned, penalties adjusted.

                            The appeal was partly allowed and partly remanded by the Tribunal. Disallowance of Cenvat Credit on various grounds was set aside, including improper invoices, horticulture services, dismantling of old labour huts, and laying of high tension cables. The issue of renovation services was remanded for fresh adjudication. The demand for Service Tax on Reverse Charge Basis was overturned, and penalties were adjusted accordingly. The stay application was disposed of.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Disallowance of Cenvat Credit of Rs. 1,65,65,202/-
                            2. Demand of Service Tax of Rs. 9,37,392/- on Reverse Charge Basis
                            3. Imposition of penalties under various sections and rules
                            4. Denial of input service credits on various grounds

                            Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Disallowance of Cenvat Credit of Rs. 1,65,65,202/-:
                            - Registration Date Discrepancy (Rs. 98,24,253/-): The appellant contested the disallowance of Cenvat Credit on the ground that they were registered with the Service Tax Department from 10 May 2007. The learned AR agreed to the factual mistake, and the Tribunal allowed this ground, setting aside the disallowance.

                            - Improper Invoices (Rs. 28,46,577/-): The disallowance was based on invoices with the wrong address. The Tribunal found that the appellant had only one registered premise and had paid the Service Tax on the services received. Thus, the credit was allowed despite the address discrepancy.

                            - Horticulture Services (Rs. 3,70,540/-): The Tribunal held that horticulture services are essential for maintaining the commercial center and attracting service receivers. Consequently, the Cenvat Credit for these services was deemed allowable.

                            - Dismantling of Old Labour Huts (Rs. 1,16,868/-): The Tribunal determined that dismantling old labour huts post-construction is essential for providing output services. Therefore, the Service Tax paid for this service was considered eligible for input credit.

                            - Laying of High Tension Cable (Rs. 7,40,238/-): The Tribunal concluded that the appellant could not provide its output services without an electricity connection. Hence, the Service Tax paid for laying the high tension cable was allowed as input credit.

                            - Renovation of Faculty at Logix Techno Park (Rs. 1,22,364/-): Due to insufficient evidence, this issue was remanded to the Adjudicating Authority for fresh adjudication after providing the appellant an opportunity for a hearing.

                            - Opening Balance of Cenvat Credit (Rs. 24,92,138/-): The Tribunal allowed this ground, noting that the appellant was registered from 10 May 2007, and thus the credit was rightly taken and reflected in their return.

                            2. Demand of Service Tax of Rs. 9,37,392/- on Reverse Charge Basis:
                            - The Tribunal found that the demand was based on an erroneous conclusion that the appellant had made a foreign currency expenditure for advertisement. The appellant demonstrated that the amount in question was for the purchase of a generator. The Tribunal set aside the demand, holding that the findings of the Commissioner were factually wrong and unsupported by material evidence.

                            3. Imposition of Penalties:
                            - The penalties under Section 78, Section 76, Section 77(1)(c)(iii) of the Act, and Rule 15 of CCR, 2004 were implicitly addressed through the resolution of the primary issues. Since the Tribunal allowed the appeal in part and remanded certain issues, the penalties associated with the disallowed credits and demands were also impacted accordingly.

                            4. Denial of Input Service Credits on Various Grounds:
                            - The Tribunal addressed and resolved the denial of input service credits on various grounds, such as improper invoices, horticulture services, dismantling of old labour huts, laying of high tension cables, and renovation services. Each ground was analyzed based on the evidence and arguments presented, leading to either allowance or remand for further adjudication.

                            Conclusion:
                            The appeal was partly allowed and partly remanded. The Tribunal set aside the disallowance of Cenvat Credit on several grounds, allowed the credit for horticulture services, dismantling of old labour huts, and laying of high tension cables, and remanded the issue of renovation services for fresh adjudication. The demand of Service Tax on Reverse Charge Basis was also set aside, and the penalties were impacted accordingly. The stay application was disposed of.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found