Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal allows appeal, stresses timely compliance with Notification No. 33/99-C.E. for refund claims</h1> <h3>Commr. of Central Excise, Guwahati Versus M/s. Duflating Tea Estate</h3> Commr. of Central Excise, Guwahati Versus M/s. Duflating Tea Estate - TMI Issues:1. Admissibility of refund claims filed after more than 5 years from the date of payment of duty under Notification No. 33/99-C.E.2. Interpretation of the provisions of Notification No. 33/99-C.E. regarding the time limit for filing refund claims.3. Application of Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 to refunds under Notification No. 33/99-C.E.4. Liberal vs. strict interpretation of exemption notifications in favor of the assessee.Admissibility of Refund Claims:The case involved a dispute over the admissibility of refund claims filed after more than 5 years from the date of payment of duty under Notification No. 33/99-C.E. The Tribunal examined whether such delayed refund claims were permissible under the law based on the specific provisions of the notification and relevant case laws. The Tribunal considered arguments from both the Revenue and the respondents/assessees regarding the format and timing of filing refund claims, emphasizing the importance of adhering to the prescribed procedures under the notification.Interpretation of Notification Provisions:The Tribunal analyzed the provisions of Notification No. 33/99-C.E., particularly clauses 2 and 3, to determine the requirements for filing refund claims within the specified time limits. The Tribunal highlighted the significance of submitting a statement of duty paid by the 7th of the next month, as outlined in the notification. The decision emphasized the need for a specific claim for refund in the statement filed under the notification, whether in the prescribed format or through RT-12 returns, to be eligible for consideration by the Assistant Commissioner or Deputy Commissioner.Application of Section 11B:The Tribunal addressed the applicability of Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944 to refunds under Notification No. 33/99-C.E. The decision clarified that the time limits prescribed under the notification governed the refund claims and that the provisions of Section 11B did not apply to such refunds. The Tribunal highlighted the importance of adhering to the specific monthly time limits set forth in the notification for filing refund statements.Liberal vs. Strict Interpretation:The judgment delved into the debate between a liberal and strict interpretation of exemption notifications in favor of the assessee. The Tribunal considered relevant case laws, including those from the Apex Court, to determine the appropriate approach to interpreting the conditions and requirements of the exemption notification. The decision emphasized the need to fulfill the mandatory conditions of the notification, such as claiming the refund of duty by the specified deadline, without allowing for liberal interpretations that deviate from the prescribed procedures.In conclusion, the Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the department, setting aside the Order-in-Appeal and emphasizing the importance of adhering to the specific time limits and procedures outlined in Notification No. 33/99-C.E. for filing refund claims to avoid being time-barred. The judgment underscored the significance of complying with the statutory provisions and the specific requirements of exemption notifications to determine the admissibility of refund claims.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found