Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2017 (9) TMI 958 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal Upholds R&D Deduction, Rejects CIT's Section 263 Revision &D The Tribunal held that the absence of Form 3CM should not invalidate the deduction claimed under Section 35(2AB) of the Income Tax Act, as the Assessee ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tribunal Upholds R&D Deduction, Rejects CIT's Section 263 Revision &D

                          The Tribunal held that the absence of Form 3CM should not invalidate the deduction claimed under Section 35(2AB) of the Income Tax Act, as the Assessee met the substantive requirements by incurring R&D expenditures and obtaining DSIR certification. The Tribunal further ruled that the CIT was not justified in invoking Section 263 to revise the assessment order, as the AO's decision was reasonable and not prejudicial to revenue interests. The Assessee's appeal was allowed, emphasizing that procedural technicalities should not override substantive compliance with the law, as supported by judicial precedents.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Whether the absence of Form 3CM can invalidate the deduction claimed under Section 35(2AB) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
                          2. Whether the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) was justified in invoking Section 263 of the Income Tax Act to revise the assessment order.

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Absence of Form 3CM and Deduction under Section 35(2AB):

                          The Assessee, a company engaged in the manufacture of wagons, claimed a deduction under Section 35(2AB) of the Income Tax Act for expenditures on scientific research and in-house research and development (R&D) facilities. The deduction was supported by a certificate of registration from the Department of Scientific and Industrial Research (DSIR) dated 14.07.2010. The Assessing Officer (AO) allowed the deduction based on this certificate.

                          The CIT, however, issued a show-cause notice under Section 263, arguing that the deduction was erroneous because the Assessee failed to submit Form 3CM as required under Rule 6(5A) of the Income Tax Rules. The Assessee responded by providing Certificates of Recognition for various periods and explaining that Form 3CM was applied for the first time in Financial Year (FY) 2015-16 and was pending for earlier years, including Assessment Year (AY) 2012-13. The Assessee contended that the information required by Form 3CM was already available in the DSIR certificate.

                          The Tribunal referred to judicial precedents, including CIT vs. Sadan Vikas (India) Ltd. and CIT vs. Claris Lifesciences Ltd., which held that the cut-off date in the DSIR certificate is irrelevant and that the key consideration is whether the Assessee incurred R&D expenditures and obtained DSIR certification. The Tribunal concluded that the absence of Form 3CM should not invalidate the deduction, as the Assessee met the substantive requirements of Section 35(2AB).

                          2. Invocation of Section 263 by CIT:

                          The CIT invoked Section 263 to revise the AO's order, arguing that the absence of Form 3CM made the order erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the revenue. The Assessee argued that the AO's decision was based on a reasonable interpretation of the law and supported by judicial precedents. The Assessee also highlighted that the CIT's action was purely based on a technicality and that the substantive conditions for the deduction were met.

                          The Tribunal noted that the AO's view was consistent with judicial pronouncements and that the CIT cannot invoke Section 263 merely because he disagrees with the AO's interpretation. The Tribunal emphasized that an order can only be revised under Section 263 if it is both erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the revenue. In this case, the Tribunal found that the AO's order was neither erroneous nor prejudicial, as it was based on a possible and reasonable interpretation of the law.

                          Conclusion:

                          The Tribunal held that the CIT was not justified in invoking Section 263 and setting aside the AO's order. The Tribunal quashed the CIT's order and allowed the Assessee's appeal, affirming that the deduction under Section 35(2AB) was valid despite the absence of Form 3CM. The Tribunal's decision was based on the principle that substantive compliance with the law should not be invalidated by procedural technicalities, especially when supported by judicial precedents. The appeal of the Assessee was allowed, and the order was pronounced in court on 13.09.2017.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found