Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether refund of service tax paid on services received by a Special Economic Zone unit and consumed wholly within the Special Economic Zone was inadmissible under Notification No. 9/2009-ST as amended, and whether such refund could instead be granted under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944.
Analysis: The amended clause (c) of Notification No. 9/2009-ST excludes refund by way of exemption for services consumed wholly within the Special Economic Zone. At the same time, the opening part of the notification continues to exempt services provided in relation to authorised operations in a Special Economic Zone and received by a unit therein. On that reasoning, the services in question remained exempt, and the tax paid on them was not payable. Since service tax had in fact been paid on otherwise exempt services, the refund was not to be considered under Notification No. 9/2009-ST but under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944.
Conclusion: The refund claim was held admissible under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, and the matter was sent back for fresh processing of the refund claim.