ITAT grants relief to assessee on various grounds incl. disallowance under Sec. 14A & foreign exchange loss

The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee on multiple grounds including disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, inclusion of CENVAT credit in the valuation of closing stock, disallowance of foreign exchange loss on forward contracts, and depreciation rate on UPS. The disallowances were deleted based on judicial precedents and detailed analysis, providing relief to the assessee. The order was pronounced on 11th September, 2017.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act.
2. Inclusion of CENVAT credit in the valuation of closing stock.
3. Disallowance of foreign exchange loss on forward contracts.
4. Disallowance of repairs and maintenance of plant and machinery.
5. Disallowance of repairs and maintenance of other assets.
6. Depreciation rate on UPS.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act:
The assessee contested the disallowance of Rs. 92,68,533/- out of interest and Rs. 38,50,802/- out of expenses under Section 14A, totaling Rs. 1,31,19,335/-. The AO noted investments in equity shares, with substantial amounts in foreign and Indian subsidiaries. The assessee received dividends from foreign subsidiaries, shown as income from other sources, and claimed no exempt income. The AO made disallowance under Section 14A r.w. Rule 8D. The CIT(A) partly allowed the appeal. The ITAT, referencing the Delhi High Court decision in Cheminvest Ltd. vs. CIT and the Bombay High Court decision in Principal CIT vs. Ballarpur Industries Ltd., ruled that no disallowance under Section 14A can be made as no exempt income was earned. Thus, the disallowance was deleted.

2. Inclusion of CENVAT credit in the valuation of closing stock:
The AO added unutilized CENVAT credit to the closing stock value, resulting in an addition of Rs. 1,79,57,029/-. The CIT(A) upheld the AO's action under Section 145A but directed verification of calculations. ITAT noted that Section 145A ensures correct stock valuation to avoid litigation. The ITAT referenced Supreme Court and High Court decisions, concluding that the profit remains unaffected whether inclusive or exclusive method is used. Thus, the addition was deleted.

3. Disallowance of foreign exchange loss on forward contracts:
The AO treated the loss on cancellation of forward contracts as speculative, disallowing Rs. 1,40,84,283/-. The CIT(A) confirmed this. ITAT examined Section 43(5) and noted that currency is not a commodity. Citing various judicial precedents, including the Bombay High Court decision in Badridas Gauridu (P) Ltd., ITAT concluded that the transactions were business activities, not speculative. Thus, the disallowance was deleted.

4. Disallowance of repairs and maintenance of plant and machinery:
The AO disallowed Rs. 4,42,922/- due to non-production of bills, confirmed by the CIT(A). The assessee claimed the expenses were genuine and accounted for after TDS deduction. ITAT directed the AO to verify the payments and bills, restoring the issue for re-examination. Thus, this ground was allowed for statistical purposes.

5. Disallowance of repairs and maintenance of other assets:
The AO disallowed 20% of expenses (Rs. 18,18,800/-) due to non-verifiable vouchers, confirmed by the CIT(A). The assessee provided bills for verification. ITAT noted a minor increase in expenses compared to the previous year and found the AO's observation unfounded. Thus, the disallowance was deleted.

6. Depreciation rate on UPS:
The AO allowed depreciation on UPS at 15%, while the assessee claimed 60%, resulting in a disallowance of Rs. 21,69,239/-. ITAT referenced the Mumbai Special Bench decision in DCIT vs. Datacraft India Ltd., which allowed 60% depreciation on UPS. Thus, ITAT directed the AO to allow 60% depreciation, deleting the disallowance.

Conclusion:
The ITAT partly allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, providing relief on several grounds based on judicial precedents and detailed examination of the facts and applicable laws. The order was pronounced on 11th September, 2017.

---