Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under Rule 209A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 could be imposed only when a person had physically dealt with excisable goods with the knowledge or belief that they were liable to confiscation.
Analysis: Rule 209A makes a person liable to penalty where he acquires possession of excisable goods or is otherwise concerned in transporting, removing, depositing, keeping, concealing, selling, purchasing, or otherwise dealing with such goods, with knowledge or reason to believe that they are liable to confiscation. The governing interpretation is that physical dealing with the goods is necessary for the provision to apply. On the facts, the allegation was misuse of blank gate passbooks to issue fake or forged gate passes, not physical dealing with excisable goods themselves.
Conclusion: The condition for invoking Rule 209A was not satisfied, and the penalty could not be sustained.