Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether subsidy received by dealers under the fertiliser and petroleum subsidy schemes formed part of taxable turnover under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003, in the light of Explanation VII to Section 2(iii).
Issue (i): Whether subsidy received by dealers under the fertiliser and petroleum subsidy schemes formed part of taxable turnover under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act, 2003, in the light of Explanation VII to Section 2(iii).
Analysis: The turnover definition in Section 2(iii) was held to be materially similar to the earlier sales tax statute, and Explanation VII was construed as applying only where a dealer sells goods at a price lower than the purchase price and later receives an amount towards reimbursement of the balance price. The subsidy under the Fertiliser (Control) Order and the PDS kerosene and domestic LPG scheme was found to be paid under independent governmental schemes, unrelated to the bargain between seller and purchaser and not as reimbursement of the balance sale price. The subsidies were therefore treated as amounts outside the sale consideration and outside the turnover concept addressed by Explanation VII.
Conclusion: Subsidy receipts did not form part of taxable turnover and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.