Wrongful Cenvat credit and interest timing: interest runs from availment, while estimated credit without prescribed documents is inadmissible.

Interest on wrongly availed Cenvat credit was held chargeable from the date of availment, because Section 11AB of the Central Excise Act, 1944 links interest to the wrongful taking of credit and not to the later order directing reversal. The reliance on refund-related provisions was rejected as misplaced. Cenvat credit claimed on an estimated basis under SION norms without the prescribed supporting documents was also held inadmissible, since credit must be taken only within the statutory framework and in the manner authorised by law, even where the goods are exported. Both the challenge to interest and the claim for estimated credit failed.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether interest was payable on Cenvat credit reversed by the assessee from the date of availment of credit or only from the date of the order directing reversal; (ii) Whether Cenvat credit could be taken on an estimated basis under SION norms without prescribed supporting documents merely because the goods were exported.

Issue (i): Whether interest was payable on Cenvat credit reversed by the assessee from the date of availment of credit or only from the date of the order directing reversal.

Analysis: The credit had been taken pursuant to orders allowing availment, but it was later denied and reversed. The governing provision for demand of interest was held to be Section 11AB of the Central Excise Act, 1944, which makes interest payable from the relevant statutory point once duty or credit is found to have been wrongly availed or refunded. The reliance placed on refund-related provisions was found misplaced because the controversy concerned demand of interest on wrongful credit, not the determination of the refund date. The principle applied was that interest follows the wrongful availment itself and not the later reversal order.

Conclusion: Interest was correctly demanded from the date of availment of the credit and not from the date of the reversal order.

Issue (ii): Whether Cenvat credit could be taken on an estimated basis under SION norms without prescribed supporting documents merely because the goods were exported.

Analysis: Cenvat credit is permissible only within the framework of the prescribed rules and conditions. Mere export of goods does not confer an unrestricted right to devise a self-created method of credit availment. Even if taxes should not be exported in principle, the benefit must be claimed only in the manner authorized by law and supported by the required documentation. In the absence of such legal basis, estimated credit under SION norms was not admissible.

Conclusion: The estimated Cenvat credit was not allowable.

Final Conclusion: Both challenges failed and the impugned orders sustaining interest and denying the disputed credit were upheld.

Ratio Decidendi: Interest on wrongful credit is chargeable from the date of availment, and Cenvat credit cannot be claimed outside the statutory framework or on a self-devised estimated basis.

---