Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit on furnace oil used for generation of steam in an adjacent premises was admissible, and whether the denial could be sustained when the lapse was procedural and the benefit had been allowed for a subsequent period.
Analysis: Rule 57B(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 enlarged the scope of eligible inputs to include inputs used for generation of steam used for manufacture of final products, subject to the requirement that the steam be used within the factory of production. The order under challenge also recognised that credit could be taken by following the procedure contemplated under Rules 57F(3) and 57F(4). The denial was founded on the fact that the boiler and furnace were installed in premises adjoining the appellant's factory, but the defect pointed out was procedural in nature. The fact that the same credit had been allowed for a subsequent period and accepted by the revenue supported the appellant's case.
Conclusion: The credit was held admissible and the denial was not sustained; the appeal was allowed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where inputs are used for generation of steam in relation to manufacture and the only objection is procedural, Modvat credit cannot be denied if the substantive entitlement is otherwise satisfied and the procedure can be complied with.