Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a CBDT circular issued under Section 119 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 could amend the provisions of Rule 68B of the Second Schedule to the Income-tax Act, 1961 and thereby alter provisions having statutory force.
Analysis: A circular issued by the CBDT under Section 119 cannot override or amend statutory provisions contained in the Second Schedule. Rule 68B forms part of the statutory scheme and has legislative force. Any attempt by the Board, in exercise of administrative power, to modify such provisions is beyond the authority conferred by Section 119 and is ultra vires.
Conclusion: The circular was ultra vires and rightly quashed.
Final Conclusion: The challenge to the High Court's decision failed, and the appeal stood dismissed.
Ratio Decidendi: An administrative circular cannot amend or override statutory provisions having legislative force, even if issued under Section 119 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.