Enforcement Officer Exceeded Jurisdiction in TNVAT Case

The High Court held that the Enforcement Wing Officer exceeded jurisdiction by issuing notices for objections and re-assessment under the TNVAT Act, 2006. The Enforcement Wing's role is limited to preparing reports for the assessing officer, who must independently consider objections without influence. The notices by the Enforcement Wing Officer were declared invalid, directing the petitioner to submit objections to the assessing officer within fifteen days. The assessing officer was instructed to provide a personal hearing and complete the assessment independently. Writ petitions were partly allowed with no costs awarded.

---

---

Issues: Jurisdiction of Enforcement Wing Officer to issue notices for objections and re-assessment under TNVAT Act, 2006.

Analysis:
The petitioner, a registered dealer under the TNVAT Act, challenged notices issued by the Assistant Commissioner of the Enforcement Wing and the assessing officer. The petitioner objected to the Enforcement Wing Officer's jurisdiction to call for objections, produce books of account, and conduct personal hearings. The petitioner contended that the assessing officer should independently consider objections without influence from the Enforcement Wing. The petitioner relied on previous court decisions to support this argument.

The High Court noted that the Enforcement Wing official cannot assume the powers of the assessing officer. The Enforcement Wing's role is limited to preparing reports based on inspections, which may lead to revision notices by the assessing officer. The assessing officer must consider objections independently and make decisions without being influenced by the Enforcement Wing's observations. Consequently, the notices issued by the Enforcement Wing Officer were deemed unenforceable.

As a result, the writ petitions were partly allowed. The notices issued by the Enforcement Wing Officer were declared invalid, and the petitioner was directed to submit objections to the assessing officer within fifteen days. The assessing officer was instructed to provide a personal hearing to the petitioner and complete the assessment in compliance with the law. No costs were awarded, and the connected miscellaneous petitions were closed.

---