1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Supreme Court dismisses appeal on exemption entitlement under Notification No.6/2006. Decision aligned with larger Bench ruling. Appeal delay condoned. /2006</h1> The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal regarding entitlement to exemption under Notification No.6/2006 dated 1st March, 2006, as the Tribunal's decision ... Denial of the benefit of N/N. 6/2006, dated 1-3-2006 - anchor rings and load spreading plates - the decision in the case of Rakhoh Enterprises Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune [2016 (11) TMI 1207 - CESTAT MUMBAI] contested - Held that: - In deciding the issue of entitlement of the respondent β Assessee to the benefit of exemption under the Notification in question (No.6/2006 dated 1st March, 2006) the Tribunal has relied upon the decision of a larger Bench. The said decision of the larger Bench is not under challenge - present appeal dismissed. The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal concerning entitlement to exemption under Notification No.6/2006 dated 1st March, 2006 as the Tribunal's decision based on a larger Bench's ruling was not challenged. Delay was condoned.