Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the addition of Rs. 4 crores made by the CIT(A) as unexplained income of the assessee was sustainable under section 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The amount was traced through the ledger accounts of M/s OEC Diascans Ltd., the two directors, and the assessee company. The bank statements and bank certificate supported the movement of cash and its return when the transaction did not materialise. The Department did not bring any material to rebut the sequence of transactions or to disprove the identity and financial capacity of the company from which the money had originated. Once the assessee established the identity of the parties, the movement of funds, and the genuineness of the transaction, it was not required to prove the source of source.
Conclusion: The addition of Rs. 4 crores was not justified and was deleted; the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.