Excise valuation of cement pipes: delivery at buyer's premises meant transport and laying charges were not deductible.

Transportation, laying, joining and testing charges for cement pipes were held not deductible from assessable value because the contract required the manufacturer to transport the goods to the site and complete unloading, shifting, lowering, laying and joining before delivery. On that factual basis, property in the goods was found to pass only at the buyer's premises, not at the factory gate. Applying Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944, with the valuation principles and Section 19 of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, expenses incurred before transfer of ownership remained part of assessable value. The deductions were disallowed, the revenue's valuation was upheld, and the adjudication order was restored.

---

---

Issues: Whether transportation, laying, joining and testing charges were deductible from the assessable value of cement pipes, and whether the property in the goods passed at the factory gate or only at the buyer's premises.

Analysis: The contract and the show-cause notice showed that the manufacturer was obliged not merely to supply the pipes but also to transport them to the site and carry out unloading, shifting, lowering, laying and joining before handing them over. On those facts, the transfer of property in the goods did not take place at the factory gate. The valuation had therefore to be determined with reference to the point at which ownership passed to the buyer. Under Section 4 of the Central Excise Act, 1944, read with the valuation principles affirmed by the Supreme Court, expenses incurred after the transfer of ownership could not be excluded from assessable value. Section 19 of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930 also applied, because the intention of the parties was that property would pass only when delivery was completed at the buyer's premises.

Conclusion: The deductions claimed were not allowable and the valuation adopted by the revenue was correct.

Final Conclusion: The appellate order was set aside and the adjudication order was restored, with the result that the revenue's appeals succeeded.

Ratio Decidendi: Where the contract shows that ownership in excisable goods passes only on delivery at the buyer's premises, expenses incurred after that transfer are not deductible from the assessable value under excise valuation law.

---