Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Cenvat credit was admissible on HR coils, CR/SS sheets, MS channels, angles and similar structural steel items used in fabricating support structures for capital goods installed in the factory.
Analysis: The dispute turned on whether the structural items, after being used in fabrication of support structures for machines such as kiln, conveyor system and furnace, could be treated as part of the capital goods or as eligible inputs under the Cenvat scheme. Applying the user test and the settled principle that items used to fabricate support structures integral to the functioning of capital goods may be treated as components or parts of such capital goods, the Tribunal held that the fabricated structures were not mere civil constructions but aided the working of the machinery. On that basis, the credit was held to be admissible.
Conclusion: The Revenue's challenge failed and the assessee was held entitled to Cenvat credit on the disputed structural items.
Ratio Decidendi: Structural steel items used in fabricating support structures for capital goods qualify for Cenvat credit when, on applying the user test, they constitute parts or components of the machinery rather than mere civil structures.