Court orders Income Tax Department to adjust seized cash against advance tax liability per CBDT circular. The Court held in favor of the petitioners, directing the Income Tax Department to adjust the cash seized during a search operation against their advance ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Court orders Income Tax Department to adjust seized cash against advance tax liability per CBDT circular.
The Court held in favor of the petitioners, directing the Income Tax Department to adjust the cash seized during a search operation against their advance tax liability. The Court considered a circular issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes, which clarified that adjustments against advance tax should be allowed. The Department was instructed to grant the benefit of the circular to the petitioners and allow the adjustments from the date of their initial requests. The petitions were allowed without costs, and pending applications were disposed of accordingly.
Issues: Whether the Income Tax Department is obliged to adjust the cash seized during a search operation against the advance tax payment due from the petitionersRs.
Analysis: The case involved two petitioners who had cash seized during a search operation under the Income Tax Act. The petitioners requested adjustment of the seized cash against their advance tax liability for the relevant assessment year. However, the Department adjusted the seized cash against the tax demand resulting in the petitioners being liable to pay interest under Section 234A, 234B, and 234C of the Act. The petitioners argued that the Department should have adjusted the seized cash towards the advance tax liability to avoid interest payment.
The Central Board of Direct Taxes issued Circular No. 20/2017 clarifying that the insertion of Explanation 2 to Section 132B of the Act, stating that advance tax payable is not part of existing liability, would have prospective application. The circular also mentioned that the Department would withdraw or not press appeals where adjustments against advance tax had been allowed by High Courts.
The Court considered the circular and held that the Department should grant the benefit of the circular to the petitioners. It was deemed discriminatory to deny the benefit to defaulting assesses who had requested adjustment of seized cash against advance tax dues before the circular's effective date. The Court directed the Department to allow the petitioners' requests for adjustment against their advance tax liability from the date of their initial requests, i.e., December 13, 2011. The petitions were allowed without costs, and pending applications were disposed of accordingly.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.