Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the adjudicating authority should be directed to consider the petitioner's representations and proceed with adjudication of the rebate-related show cause notices in the light of the CESTAT order.
Analysis: The petition raised a grievance that the rebate applications and the connected show cause notices had remained pending despite replies and later representations. The Court noted the existence of the Tribunal's decision, the uncertainty as to whether the department would challenge that decision, and the fact that the writ petition was being disposed of at the admission stage. It also took note that the petitioner had sought early adjudication only after succeeding before the Tribunal.
Outcome: The writ petition was disposed of with a direction to the second respondent to consider the petitioner's representations and pass appropriate orders on merits in accordance with law within five weeks. If the departmental position is to accept the Tribunal's decision, the adjudicating authority is to commence adjudication, afford personal hearing, and complete the process within a reasonable time.