1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>CESTAT rules in favor of appellants in service tax case on clearing and forwarding services</h1> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai ruled in favor of the appellants in a service tax case related to clearing and forwarding services. The tribunal ... Clearing and Forwarding Service - activity of the assessees consists of receipt of goods from their principals, storage of the same in their premises, despatch of the same to clients on their sale invoices, maintenance of records for receipts, sales, preparation of periodical statements about stock position, collection of amount from the clients on behalf of their principals and remittance of the amount collected from the clients and undertaking of payment of taxes and rental charges of godown etc. on behalf of the principals β held that β the activity can not be held to be a clearing and forwarding services so as to be liable to service tax under this category β demand and penalty set aside. The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai ruled in favor of the appellants in a service tax case related to clearing and forwarding services. The tribunal found that the appellants were not liable for service tax as they did not undertake the clearance of goods from their principals. The decision was based on a previous ruling by the Punjab & Haryana High Court. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.