Natural justice bars blacklisting without notice or hearing; debarment was quashed for lack of fair procedure.

Blacklisting or debarment that carries serious civil consequences cannot be imposed arbitrarily and must be preceded by fair notice and a reasonable opportunity to be heard. The Madras High Court found the impugned order unsustainable because it was issued without a show-cause notice and without a clear basis for the adverse action. The later finding that the goods were not adulterated further supported setting aside the debarment. The blacklisting order was therefore quashed for breach of natural justice.

---

---

Issues: Whether the order debarring the petitioner from participating in daily tender sales for four years could stand when it was passed without notice and without a discernible basis.

Analysis: Debarment or blacklisting has serious civil consequences and cannot be imposed arbitrarily. A person likely to be affected by such action is entitled to a reasonable opportunity to show cause before any adverse order is made. In the present case, the order was passed without issuing any show cause notice and the basis for the action was not made clear. In the circumstances, the subsequent finding that the goods had not been adulterated reinforced the unsustainability of the impugned action.

Conclusion: The debarment order was unsustainable and was set aside.

Final Conclusion: The petitioner succeeded, and the impugned blacklisting order was quashed for breach of natural justice.

Ratio Decidendi: An order of blacklisting or debarment having civil consequences cannot be sustained unless preceded by fair notice and a reasonable opportunity of being heard.

---