Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the refund claim of service tax paid without protest was barred by limitation under section 11B as made applicable to service tax, and whether the amount could be returned outside that statutory period on the ground that the levy was without authority of law.
Analysis: The respondent had voluntarily taken registration, paid service tax for the relevant period without protest, and filed the refund claim only after the Board's circular clarified the taxability position. The Tribunal held that even where tax is collected by misinterpretation or misapplication of law, refund must still be claimed under the relevant enactment and within the limitation period prescribed therein. By virtue of section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994, the limitation under section 11B applied to service tax refunds. Since the claim was filed beyond one year from the relevant date, it was barred by limitation.
Conclusion: The refund claim was time-barred and the assessee was not entitled to refund outside the statutory limitation period.
Final Conclusion: The Revenue's challenge succeeded and the refund order was set aside because the claim for return of service tax was not maintainable after expiry of the limitation period.
Ratio Decidendi: A refund of tax alleged to have been collected without authority of law must nevertheless be sought under the governing statute within the prescribed limitation period, where that limitation applies.