Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether refund of Special Additional Duty under Notification No. 102/2007-Cus could be denied merely because the sale invoices were issued before the out-of-charge order, when the other conditions of the notification were shown to have been satisfied.
Analysis: The refund claims were rejected only on the ground that the sale invoices preceded the out-of-charge order. The Tribunal noted that the assessee had produced VAT payment challans, sales invoices, delivery-related documents and a Chartered Accountant's reconciliation certificate linking the imported goods with the sales invoices. The issue was covered by an earlier Tribunal decision holding that invoice timing by itself does not establish that the goods sold were different from the imported goods and that rejection on that ground alone is not sustainable when the surrounding evidence supports the claim.
Conclusion: The denial of refund on the sole ground that the sale invoices were raised before out-of-charge was not sustainable, and the refund claim was allowed in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Refund under the SAD exemption notification cannot be refused solely because the sales invoice predates out-of-charge if the claimant otherwise establishes compliance with the notification conditions and correlation between the imported goods and the sold goods.