Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether directions should be issued for compliance with the earlier order and whether notice should be issued for initiating contempt proceedings for non-compliance.
Analysis: The goods had earlier been ordered to be released, but the record placed before the Tribunal indicated continued non-compliance. On the affidavit and the conduct shown by the customs officer, the Tribunal formed the view that the order dated 12-7-2016 was being deliberately avoided. In these circumstances, the Tribunal invoked its procedural powers under Rule 41 of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax (Procedure) Rules, 1982 and required the concerned officer to explain why contempt proceedings should not be initiated.
Conclusion: Notice was issued to the Assistant Commissioner to show cause against initiation of contempt proceedings, returnable on the specified date.