Tribunal Admits Insolvency Application: Default on Rupee Term Loan

The Tribunal admitted the application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, filed by a company against another for defaulting on a Rupee Term Loan. The Tribunal found evidence of default, appointed an Interim Resolution Professional, and declared a moratorium under Section 13 of the Code to protect the corporate debtor's assets during the insolvency resolution process. The order aimed to facilitate an effective resolution process while ensuring continuity of essential services supply.

---

---

Issues:
Application invoking Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016; Existence of default in payment of debt; Appointment of Interim Resolution Professional; Declaration of moratorium under Section 13 of the Code.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Application invoking Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016:
- The applicant, a company, filed an application under Section 7 of the Code against the respondent company for defaulting on a Rupee Term Loan. Various legal documents were executed as security for the loan, including a Deed of Hypothecation and a Demand Promissory Note. The respondent failed to repay the loan as per the agreement terms, leading to dishonored cheques and legal proceedings. The applicant provided evidence of default and filed a complete application, proposing an Interim Resolution Professional.

2. Existence of default in payment of debt:
- The Tribunal analyzed the loan agreements, supplementary agreements, and financial records to establish the default in payment by the respondent to the applicant. The respondent acknowledged the debt in its annual reports for multiple years. The Tribunal concluded that the applicant is a Financial Creditor, and the respondent is a Corporate Debtor, satisfying the conditions under Section 7 of the Code. The pendency of proceedings before other forums did not preclude admission of the application.

3. Appointment of Interim Resolution Professional:
- Considering the merits of the case and the public interest, the Tribunal admitted the application under Section 7(5) of the Code. Shri Kuldip Verma was appointed as the Interim Insolvency Resolution Professional to oversee the resolution process. A moratorium was declared under Section 13(1)(a) of the Code, prohibiting certain actions against the corporate debtor, and a public announcement of the initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process was mandated.

4. Declaration of moratorium under Section 13 of the Code:
- The Tribunal passed an order declaring a moratorium to protect the corporate debtor's assets during the insolvency resolution process. The moratorium prohibited suits, asset transfers, enforcement of security interests, and recovery actions against the debtor. Essential services supply was exempted from the moratorium, ensuring continuity. The order was to be communicated to the parties involved, maintaining the integrity of the resolution process.

This detailed analysis highlights the key aspects of the judgment, covering the legal grounds for invoking the insolvency proceedings, establishing default, appointing a resolution professional, and implementing a moratorium to facilitate the resolution process effectively.

---