1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Supreme Court Dismisses Special Leave Petitions, Condoning Delay, and Disposing Pending Applications</h1> The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petitions, condoned the delay, and disposed of pending applications. - 2017 (348) E.L.T. A172 (SC) Enhancement of Anti Dumping Duty - rubber chemicals known as PX13 (6 PPD) - Mid Term Review - Notification No. 92/2011-Cus. dated 20.09.2011 - imports of subject goods from PR China and Korea RP - Rule 23 of Anti Dumping Rules indicate the powers of the DA to review the need for continued imposition of any AD duty on its own initiative or upon request by any interested party - the decision in the case of M/s Rishiroop Polymers Pvt. Ltd., M/s Kumho Petrochemicals Limited and M/s National Organic Chemical Industries Ltd. Versus Designated Authority, DGAD Respondent Ministry of Finance [2016 (9) TMI 1166 - CESTAT NEW DELHI] contested, where it was held that there is significant change in the facts and circumstances that it is considered necessary either to withdraw or modify appropriately the AD duty which has been imposed the DA can act accordingly - Held that: - the decision in the above case upheld - SLP dismissed - decided against petitioner. The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petitions and condoned the delay. Pending applications were disposed of. (2017 (8) TMI 682 - SC)