Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessing authority could invoke rectification powers under Section 55 of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 on the footing that the revised assessment, made after acceptance of belated C forms pursuant to appellate directions, suffered from an error apparent on the face of the record.
Analysis: Rectification under Section 55 is confined to obvious, glaring and self-evident mistakes discernible from the record itself. It does not permit reappraisal of disputed questions of fact or law, nor can it be used as a substitute for appeal or revision. The impugned notice proceeded on the theory that the assessment had merged with the appellate order and that the reassessment on belated C forms was therefore jurisdictionally flawed. That contention did not disclose an apparent error on the face of the record, because it depended on examination of the legal effect of the appellate order and the permissibility of accepting C forms on sufficient cause, issues which were not amenable to rectification.
Conclusion: The invocation of Section 55 was not justified, and the impugned notice was without jurisdiction.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition succeeded, the notice was set aside, and the department was left free to proceed only under such other provisions as may be available in law.
Ratio Decidendi: Rectification powers cannot be used to reopen or revise a matter involving debatable legal questions or jurisdictional objections, and are confined to patent errors apparent from the record.